Learning Styles Useless to Teachers

1 Comments
Join the Conversation
Focus on Student Similarities Rather than Differences - Photo by: kconnors
Focus on Student Similarities Rather than Differences - Photo by: kconnors
Research shows that students may not learn best by the popular idea of different learning styles.

How do you learn best? Do you learn best by looking at information in charts and graphs? Do you learn best by listening to information? Or do you learn best by manipulating objects with your hands? These three learning styles – visual, auditory and kinesthetic, are the backbone to many teacher lesson plans and the basis for numerous teacher training days. Unfortunately, despite the widespread agreement on the issue, the idea of learning styles is not supported by scientific research and may in fact not be the best method for teachers to focus instructional methods.

Learning Styles the Result of Faulty Research

According to the APS (Association for Psychological Science), there is no evidence to support the theory of different learning styles. A report published in Psychological Science in the Public Interest by Hal Pashler, Mark McDaniel, Doug Rohrer and Robert Bjork show through a review of literature that the studies showing multiple learning styles do not follow proper protocol and are not credible (“Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence” December, 2009).

To properly test the theory of multiple learning styles, studies must be randomized. Likewise, the results of properly preformed studies must be able to be repeated. The handful of studies that followed proper protocols had conflicting results which in effect debunks the idea that individuals learn best through different modalities (visual, tactile or auditory).

The Impact of Learning Styles Research on Education

The first and most frustrating impact of this research is that teachers and administrative staff have spent precious time and money on training and planning lessons around the concept that different students learn best in different modalities. According to Psychologist Dan Willingham from the University of Virginia, it is a better idea to focus lessons and training on those similarities that students have rather than on the differences.

One way he suggests doing this is to mix things up more – an idea that is scientifically supported to boost attention. Additional studies show that the more students pay attention, the better they learn, according to Willingham. He also suggests that the brain retains information better over a longer period of time, so it is important for teachers to spread learning out as much as possible.

This information flies in the face of many teachers and educational professionals, but in the effort to improve education by using research based ideas, it is important to recognize where we have gone wrong and focus our efforts on new ideas.

Jennifer Wagaman, Damien Wagaman

Jennifer Wagaman - Jennifer is a mother of 2 and has both public, private and administrative experience in the education field.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 7+8?

Comments

Oct 24, 2011 2:28 AM
Guest :
I believe the act of learning, is best taught by modeling a behavior of learning and letting them understand how you are learning / respecting...also, by listening to understand which is respecting your students first, it gives you a better understanding of them when it is your turn to communicate. As people reciprocate behavior in the absence of fear.

The problem with teaching children differently before age ten, is that their self image is being established and if you treat them as being less intelligent than other students, they will see themselves as stupid and fulfill their vision of themselves.Often the only problem that exists, is that some students are physically and mentally more mature do to being as many as 11 months older...In Belgium, teachers do not identify intelligence in students and modify teaching students based on the child's comprehension level until after 10 years old. I believe this model helps students develop mental and physical maturity, while not judging themselves to be stupid, which helps children develop and maintain expectations of success in education...and let the younger students know that some students in the classroom are older than you by months and early in your education, this can effect your ability to comprehend information as quickly as they do...nothing to do with your intelligence...and that as a teacher, I will give you some extra attention in order to help you get it quicker, but do not worry about it you will catch up and in some instances surpass older classmates in your ability to learn in the educational setting.

Also praise effort, not results...because if you praise results, students who don't get results right away will give up trying...good effort , you are really working hard etc...will help students stay on task and work towards getting results...also praise mistakes as teachable moments, not as weakness. Successful, people make many mistakes, but because they learn from them, they are often new mistakes, that they then learn from and gain progress towards what ever goal the person is moving towards...
1
Advertisement
Advertisement